My client, the general manager of a world class hotel, was accused of indecent assaults on two women on the Tube. In one I showed

 My client, a university student, was accused of gang rape. My intensive analysis of the accuser’s account revealed numerous contradictions, unravelling her complaint. The prosecution

My client was a drama student, accused of rape. He had no memory of the events. Consent was inferred via careful cross-examination of the complainant.

My client, the former headmaster of an independent school, was accused of molesting five of his pupils 40 years before. I argued on medical grounds

My client was accused of historic sexual assault of his nieces, and possession of indecent images. The cases were separately tried because of my initiative,

Two footballers (one Internationally capped) were accused of rape. The complainant claimed she had been given Rohypnol, and told the jury she was ‘out of

My client, an investment banker, allegedly exposed his penis to female cleaners, requesting masturbation. One was shown to be unreliable before trial; the other, under

My client was an investment banker accused of kerb-crawling. I cross examined 4 police officers, none of whom were consistent, and all of whom contradicted

My client was a student on trial for raping another student. The issue was consent. Eyewitnesses described their intimacy on the dancefloor. The motive for

My client, an elderly man accused of sexual assault on a child. She wholly contradicted her previous accounts under my questioning. The Judge, in consequence,