R v S-B Southwark Crown Court
I represented a publisher accused of fraud. Former No.10 adviser was complainant. My cross-examination undermined the prosecution case, which the Judge threw out, following my
I represented a publisher accused of fraud. Former No.10 adviser was complainant. My cross-examination undermined the prosecution case, which the Judge threw out, following my
Major tobacco smuggling operation involving the loss of tax millions on duty. Judge stopped the case against my client pre-trial on my application because of
I am currently representing a Doctor of unblemished character accused of sexually assaulting one of his patients, and performing procedures upon her without (it is
Historic case of indecent assaults and buggery by ex-UK SpecialForces operative on another soldier. The accuser, in cross examination admitted that hewas a coward, a
The Cirencester College May Ball rape trial. 25,000 documents rapidly assimilated from complainant’s mobile phone, after disclosed on first day of trial. Allegation of gang
I defended a plastic surgeon accused of sexual assaults on nurses before a Disciplinary Tribunal. My cross examination and legal arguments cleared him.
I represented a psychiatrist accused of sexually assaulting a man on the Tube. Detailed preparation of cross-examination exposed many inconsistencies. The Doctor was found not
Vicious allegations of marital rape, arising during an acrimonious divorce. Cogent exposition of motive in cross-examination lead to my client being found not guilty.
My client was accused of repeatedly raping his lover, over one hundred times, threatening to kill her to ensure her compliance. The story she told
Company Director, and accountant, accused of sexual assault on a female job applicant. She was contradicted by texts, and when questioned by me began to