R v L Croydon Crown Court
A multimillion pharmaceutical fraud – my client pleaded guilty after exhausting procedural arguments on the prosecution’s method of investigation.
A multimillion pharmaceutical fraud – my client pleaded guilty after exhausting procedural arguments on the prosecution’s method of investigation.
A multi-million money laundering case. My client was accused of being the mastermind. The case was stopped by the Court on my application that the
My client was accused of historic sexual assault of his nieces, and possession of indecent images. The cases were separately tried because of my initiative,
My client (a solicitor) cleared of money laundering connected to a questionable sale of a property. In return for withdrawing a judicial review (for which
My client was convicted of a fraud on her employer, the Prudential. I had argued that there was no case to answer, but the judge
I represented a financier accused of massive fraud on a Saudi Prince. Fierce battle with prosecution over disclosure of material that undermined its case. Prosecution,
I obtained a non-custodial sentence for an employee who stole a substantial amount from his employer in breach of trust. Set aside costs order made
Banking fraud involving insider dealing. My client was blamed by a co-accused, whom I demolished in cross-examination. The co-accused was convicted in that trial, in